|
|
Long Range Plan |
|
|
|
|
Self-Evaluation |
|
|
|
|
Teaching Your Unit During Student Teaching: Demonstrating Positive Impact on Student Learning |
TEED 521 Home | Orientation | Course Materials | News and Announcements | Literacy | Mathematics/Science | Social Studies
| Name of Assignment: Reflection |
| Date Due: December 10 |
| Faculty to be contacted for specific questions: M. McGuire, M. Roddy |
Objectives:
1. Considers ethical dimensions of teaching and applies those considerations in choices of curriculum, instructional strategies, assessment and strategies to address individual differences.
2. Continually evaluates the effects of his/her choices and action on others (students, parents, and other professionals in the learning community) and actively seeks out opportunities to grow professionally.
Rationale for the assignment:
Active reflection on all aspects of teaching helps you refine your teaching
and grow professionally. Inherent in reflection is a commitment to the ethical
dimensions of what we do when we teach. These assignments are intended to help
you reflect on what you are learning, consider multiple perspectives on teaching,
weigh the long-term consequences of decisions, and motivate you to grow professionally.
Description of the assignment: Select one of the following reflection activities. In your write-up, refer to the attributes of the model described below.
1. Journal: Keep a daily journal in which you reflect on ideas triggered by readings, experiences, or events related to this course. Concentrate on the ethical issues (as described in objective #1 above) that confront you during this time. You do not need to turn in the journal itself. Write a one- to two-page report on the effect the journal process had on you. In your summary, address the four attributes of a reflective teacher described on the next page.
2. Discussion group: Form a discussion group with three or four colleagues and meet at least once a week throughout the quarter to discuss issues raised within the context of this course related to the four attributes of a reflective teacher described on the next page. Write a one- to two-page summary of the experience addressing the four attributes of a reflective teacher described on the next page.
3. Design your own experience: Design a reflection assignment that addresses the objectives outlined above; include a brief rationale and description. The assignment you submit must address the four attributes of a reflective teacher described on the next page. This must be approved in advance by one of your instructors.
Attributes of the Reflective Teacher
Efficacy refers to the teachers' beliefs that they
can have an impact on children and schools. Without such a belief, teachers
will not be motivated to examine their own practice and look for deeper meanings.
Efficacious teachers are willing to experiment and take risks because they believe
they can make a difference in the lives of their students. Such an endeavor
would be too threatening to low-efficacy teachers.
Flexibility is important because reflection requires
taking another perspective, looking at the world through another's eyes to find
new meaning and interpretations. Flexibility is also necessary for responsive
teaching; things do not always turn out as expected and on-the-spot adaptations
and innovations are often required.
Reflective teachers are socially responsible. They
care about the democratic foundations of America and strive to encourage socially
responsible actions in their students. They participate actively in their school,
district, local, and global communities. Finally, they care about others and
contribute their time to social causes.
Consciousness is very similar to what we have referred
to as metacognition-- the awareness of one's own thinking and decision-making.
Reflective teachers can explain to other professionals their reasoning behind
given actions. While intuitive teaching is certainly valuable, it can make communication
with a novice difficult. The precision of language required to clarify one's
own thinking--or that of others--clearly promotes deeper reflection and awareness
of meaning. (p. 50)
Reflective teachers take responsibility to help others develop the capacity
to care…. They model caring relationships with students, colleagues, and
families. Caring teachers are good listeners who search for understanding, empathy,
and appreciation and actively explore ways to organize their teaching and curriculum
around issues of care for others and self (Langer & Colton, 1994).
Reprinted by permission. Copyright by the American Association
of Colleges for Teacher Education. Amy Colton and Georgia Sparks-Langer (1993).
A conceptual framework to guide the development of teacher education and decision
making. Journal of Teacher Education, 44, 1, 45-54. Updated, 1994.
Langer, G.M., & Colton, A.B. (1994). Reflective decision making: The cornerstone
of school reform. Journal of Staff Development. 15(1), pp. 2-7.
Criteria for Evaluation:
1. The assignment addresses the objectives outlined.
2. The assignment demonstrates application of the attributes of a reflective
teacher listed below. The assignment refers to the attributes of the
reflection model.
3. The assignment is clearly written and demonstrates evidence of thoughtful
preparation and commitment to professional growth.
| Name of Assignment: Social Studies Long Range Plan |
| Faculty to be contacted for specific questions: Margit McGuire |
Objectives:
1. Plans instruction based upon knowledge of subject matter (essential learnings,
concepts, generalizations, principles, and skills specific to the core subject
areas), students, the community, and curriculum goals.
2. Synthesizes components of effective instruction by selecting units of study
that reflect an integration of curriculum.
3. Considers ethical dimensions of teaching and applies those considerations
in choices of curriculum, instructional strategies, assessment and strategies
to address individual differences.
Rationale for the assignment:
Research highlights the importance of social studies teachers being clear about
the goals and objectives for their social studies programs. Further, long range
planning assists you in providing direction and making choices as you proceed
through the school year. Therefore, you are to write a plan which addresses
the questions listed below.
Key questions for your consideration
1. What is the purpose of social studies for your classroom? What is your rationale
for this purpose? (Identify a grade level of your choice.) (Rubric 1)
2. What unit topics will be included? Identify a “possible” major
project or strategy that will tie the topics of study together. For example,
a class book, mural, or service learning project can purpose and meaning to
a unit topic. Storypaths or simulations are strategies that also serve to give
purpose and meaning to a unit topic. (Rubric 2)
3. What learning targets do you have for each unit? How do these learning targets
reflect your purpose for social studies? Identify learning targets in the following
categories for each unit: concepts/generalizations, skills/processes, and dispositions.
Limit the learning targets for each category to 3 or 4–perhaps fewer for
dispositions--remembering focus and depth are key elements in unit planning.
(Rubrics 3,4, and 5)
4. What Essential Academic Learning Requirements will you address in each unit
plan? How do these EALRs connect and build upon one another during the course
of a yearlong study in social studies? (Rubric 6)
5. Where are there places to naturally integrate the social studies program
with other subjects? (Rubric 8)
Essential Academic Learning Requirements, social studies texts, and district
curriculum guides can serve as appropriate resources in preparing your plan.
Numerous articles and books have been written which address these issues and
these can serve as resources. You may want to begin by consulting the Brophy
and Alleman’s book, Powerful Social Studies for Elementary Schools, or
Tarry Lindquist's book, Seeing the Whole Through Social Studies (optional course
text).
| Description of Assignment |
|
|
|
| 1. Purpose
State your purpose and rationale for teaching social studies. |
Purpose of social studies does not reflect a review of the literature on purpose of social studies or relies solely on one perspective. | Purpose of social studies is clearly stated and is based on review of purposes discussed in class and other resources--citations included. | Scopes and sequences in Social Education and textbook series are also reviewed to inform social studies rationale-citations included. |
| 2. Unit Topics List unit topics for the year and major project or strategy for the topic. |
Topics are not aligned with rationale, there are too many and/or inappropriate for age level of students. Project/strategy not suitable to topic. | Topics reflect rationale, are focused and developmentally appropriate. Project/strategy are suitable to topic and student development. | Topics reflect a thorough understanding of the content areas. |
| 3. Concepts/ Generalizations Identify 3-4 key concept/generalization learning targets for each unit topic. |
Concept/generalization learning targets are unclear. Too many or too few chosen for a particular unit of study. Content is not appropriate for topic. | Can select appropriate social studies concept/generalization learning targets related to units of study Generalization learning targets are clearly stated and have substance. | Can prioritize most important content for units of study; can relate to a specific group of learners. |
4. Skills/processes Identify key skill/process learning targets for each unit. |
Too many skill/process learning targets included, are not well aligned with content or topics of units. | skill/process learning targets are based on EALRs and are appropriately sequenced and aligned with unit topics. | Skills/processes reflect a school district's delineation for a specific course. |
| 5. Dispositions |
Disposition learning targets are unfocused and not clearly articulated. | Disposition learning targets are appropriate to units of study. | Disposition learning targets are sequenced and build upon one another throughout the year. |
6. EALRs |
Uses too few or too many EALRs; inappropriately aligns EALRs to unit plans. | Uses appropriate EALRs in long range plan, understands course topics related to a specific school district scope and sequence. | |
7.Sequencing/Pacing Sequence unit topics for a year-long plan |
There are an unrealistic number of topics for a yearlong plan. Topics do not relate one to the other; some topics not appropriate. | Selects an appropriate number of unit topics: developmentally appropriate for a year of study considering learning targets to be taught, has a clear topic focus for each unit. Units are well sequenced and build upon one another. | Can realistically project learning time for each unit. |
| 8. Integration | Social studies content and literacy processes are not always supportive of each other. There are too many new learnings being integrated simultaneously. | Social studies content is integrated with literacy and other subjects (as appropriate) reflecting a relevant connection --literacy processes developed from unit to unit. | Social studies content is integrated with other subject areas reflecting a relevant connection with literacy, science, math and the arts--as appropriate. |
| 9. Organization
Create a calendar from September until June in which you broadly outline your long range plan. |
Unit topics are unrealistic in time projections. | Unit topics are realistic in time projections for the school year. | Unit topics are related to time of year, special events as appropriate to the school year. |
10. Bibliography |
Bibliography absent or limited to less than three sources. | Bibliography reflects review of least three sources. | Bibliography reflects review of four or more sources including school districtís standards (for student teaching setting). |
| Name of Assignment: Community Resource Report |
| Faculty to be contacted for specific questions: Mark Roddy |
Objectives:
1. To consider the role of the community and business in the process of education.
2. To become familiar with educational resources available in the community.
Rationale for the assignment:
Teachers across the curriculum, particularly in mathematics and science, are
being asked to change the ways in which they teach their subjects. The integration
of the wider community and its resources is one of the recommendations we have
seen repeated in the recent literature. Yet the traditional resources available
to most teachers do not support an integrated approach to instruction. Similarly,
active learning is often part of the recommended approach to the reform curriculum.
Here again, however, the curricula available to most teachers rarely take advantage
of the opportunities and resources that might support this ideal. This is not
surprising; curricula written at the national or even at the regional level
cannot incorporate the community resources that are available to individual
teachers. It is important, therefore, for teachers to become acquainted with
a range of resources that will enable them to meet the high standards set forth
in national and state standards. They need to find out about what places like
the Pacific Science Center and the Volunteer Park Conservatory have to offer
to teachers.
Description of the assignment:
With zero, one, or two of your colleagues, please investigate and report on
a community educational resource (e.g., the Pacific Science Center, the Woodland
Park Zoo, Puget Power, etc.) that might be of assistance to you in teaching
mathematics and/or science. Produce a report which summarizes your findings.
This report can be formatted as a Web site, an iMovie, a PowerPoint presentation,
a Hyperstudio stack, etc. You will also need a handout (or a URL if you produce
a Web site) that enables your classmates to retain the information. Include
information which will allow a teacher reading this report to see at a glance,
what this resource has to offer, who to contact, how much it costs, and generally,
how to take advantage of what's available and why they should care. This handout
should be no longer than one page (plus brochures if available). Be prepared
to share your report with the rest of the group on December 9 at the Resource
Fair. The presentation will take the form of a "poster session" such
as you might encounter at a conference. You will need to set up a small "booth"
where you will display your findings. If they are electronic, please plan and
prepare in order to be able to show the report to the rest of the group in a
poster session type format. This session will be held on campus and Loyola 300,
the computer classroom, will be available.
Criteria for evaluation: Specifically, I will look for evidence
that:
1. You have conducted a thorough investigation and analysis of a community resource
which will be of use to you and to your fellow teachers,
2. You have prepared and made available to your peers a useful presentation
/ explanation of your community resource, including a handout or the URL of
your Web site.
| Name of Assignment: Literacy Assessment |
| Faculty to be contacted for specific questions: Rosemarie Engman |
Objectives:
1. Understands and uses formal and informal assessment strategies to evaluate
and ensure the continuous intellectual, social and physical development of the
learner.
2. Plans instruction based upon knowledge of subject matter (concepts, generalizations,
principles, and skills specific to the core subject areas), students, the community,
Essential Academic Learning Requirements, and curriculum goals.
3. Considers ethical dimensions of teaching and applies those considerations
in choices of curriculum, instructional strategies, assessment and strategies
to address individual differences.
Rationale for the assignments:
Classroom based assessment allows us to gather information about students' literacy
processes, strategies, and knowledge. These assignment choices will further
your understanding of the issues and processes of literacy assessment. Teachers'
decisions about assessment processes reflect their understanding of instruction,
individual differences, and the curriculum, as well as their commitment to equity
for all learners. You must know not only how to assess students, but also the
purposes, strengths, and pitfalls of assessment. Assessment is as much an ethical
as an instructional decision.
You will gain the most value from this assignment if you use it as an opportunity
to deepen your practical knowledge of assessment tools to gather information
about students. Each option allows you to explore some of the current practices
in assessment and to gain hands-on experience with assessment.
|
Description of the assignments: You will conduct an assessment
of one child's literacy strengths and needs. You may do this with a child in
your student teaching classroom or with any child in grades K-8. Select one
of the following options. If you conduct this assessment with a child in your
student teaching classroom, please plan to do it on October 16, which is the
Field Experience day set aside for this assignment.
Grades K-1 (or older ESL students who are very new to the English language).
Select one of the following:
• Duthie Index in Classroom Based Assessment:
An overview of beginning readers' strengths and needs.
• Test of Phonemic Segmentation: An assessment of beginning
readers' phonemic awareness. Materials available at this web site:
http://teams.lacoe.edu/documentation/classrooms/patti/k-1/teacher/assessment/tools/yopp.html
• The Names Test: A quick assessment of beginning readers'
phonics knowledge. Materials available for checkout from Katherine Schlick Noe.
• Concepts About Print: An assessment of beginning readers'
understanding of how print works in English language text. Materials available
at this web site: http://teams.lacoe.edu/documentation/classrooms/patti/k-1/teacher/assessment/print/concepts.html
• As applicable, choose any assessment option for Grades 2-8 below.
Write a brief report (1 - 2 pages) of the assessment you administer. Describe
what the results tell you about this child's literacy strengths and challenges.
Include in your write-up a list of the applicable Essential Learnings in Reading
and/or Writing that you have assessed. Attach a copy of the instrument(s) you
used.
Grades 2-8: Informal Reading Conference with Reading
or Spelling Survey:
Part I: Informal Reading Conference: Routman describes the Reading
Conference on pgs. 114-121 of Conversations. An Informal Reading Conference
would be appropriate for any student, grades K-8, about whom you have questions.
You should take a look at the further information provided in Appendix I: Evaluation:
Common Tools, particularly pgs. 202b-204b. A form for the IRC can be found on
pg. 165b, with an example form on pg. 164b. Include a running record in the
Informal Reading Conference. Classroom Based Assessment also has detailed
information about conducting and interpreting a running record with retelling.
Part II: Reading or Spelling Survey: A survey asks metacognitive
questions about reading or spelling (e.g., What do you do when you come to a
word you don't know? Who is a good reader you know, and what makes him/her a
good reader? What do you do when you want to write a word you can't spell?).
Classroom-Based Assessment has models of surveys you could modify or
use directly, as do several of the professional books listed below.
Write a brief report (1 - 2 pages), summarizing the results of these assessments.
Describe what the results tell you about this child's literacy strengths and
challenges. Include in your write-up a list of the applicable Essential Learnings
in Reading and/or Writing that you have assessed. Attach a copy of the instrument(s)
you used.
For additional information on this assignment, go to the Literacy Assessment
Assignment on the TEED 521 Web Site: http://classes.seattleu.edu/masters_in_teaching/teed521/professor/Literacy/litassessment.html.
Criteria for evaluation (Credit/Re-do):
1. The assignment addresses the objectives outlined.
2. The assignment clearly and appropriately addresses one or more of the Essential
Learnings for Reading and/or Writing.
3. The assessment instrument/process provides information to answer a real question
about a child's literacy strengths and challenges.
4. The assignment is clearly and effectively written and demonstrates evidence
of thoughtful preparation and commitment to professional growth.
Suggested Assessment Resources and References:
General Assessment Resources:
Barr, M.A., Craig, D.A., Fisette, D., Syverson, M.A. (1999). Assessing literacy
with the learning record: A handbook for teachers, grades k-6. Portsmouth,
NH: Heinemann.
Barr, M.A. & Syverson, M.A. (1999). Assessing literacy with the learning
record: A handbook for teachers, grades 6-12. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Fountas, I.C. & Pinnell, G.S. (1996). Guided reading: Good first teaching
for all children. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Hill, B.C., Ruptic, C. & Norwick, L. (1998). Classroom-based assessment.
Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon Publishers, Inc.
Harp, B. (1996). Handbook of literacy assessment and evaluation. Norwood, MA:
Christopher-Gordon Publishers, Inc.
Johnston, P.H. (1997). Knowing literacy: Constructive literacy assessment. York,
ME: Stenhouse.
Rhodes, L.K. (1993). Literacy assessment: A handbook of instruments. Portsmouth,
NH: Heinemann. LB1050.46 .L58 1993
Rhodes, L.K. & Shanklin, L. (1993). Windows into literacy: Assessing learners
K-8. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann. LC151 .R46 1993.
Strickland, K. & Strickland, J. (2000). Making assessment elementary. Portsmouth,
NH: Heinemann.
Swearingen, R. & Allen, D. (2000). Classroom assessment of reading processes,
2nd edition. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
Beginning Reading
Clay, M.M. (1993). An observation survey of early literacy achievement. Portsmouth,
NH: Heinemann.
Clay, M.M. (2000). Concepts about print: What have children learned about the
way we print language? Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Pinnell, G.S. & Fountas, I.C. (1998). Word matters: Teaching phonics and
spelling in the reading/writing classroom. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Phonemic Awareness
Yopp, H.K. (1995). A test for assessing phonemic awareness in young children.
The Reading Teacher, 49, 1, 20-29.
Phonics Knowledge
Dufflemeyer, F.A., Kruse, A.E., Merkley, D.J., & Fyfe, S.A. (1994). Further
validation and enhancement of the Names Test. The Reading Teacher, 48, 2, 118-128.
Running Records and Miscue Analysis:
Clay, M.M. (2000). Running records for classroom teachers. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Flynt, E.S. & Cooter, R.B., Jr. (1998). Flynt-Cooter reading inventory for
the classroom, 3rd edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
Wilde, S. (2000). Miscue analysis made easy: Building on student strengths.
Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann
Reading Conferences
Robb, L. (1996). Reading strategies that work: Teaching your students to become
better readers. New York: Scholastic.
Fluency
Hill, B.C., Ruptic, C. & Norwick, L. (1998). Classroom-based assessment.
Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon Publishers, Inc.
Clay, M.M. (1993). An observation survey of early literacy achievement. Portsmouth,
NH: Heinemann.
Opitz, M.F. & Rasinski, T.V. (1998). Good-bye round robin: 25 effective
oral reading strategies. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Retelling
Hoyt, L. (1999). Revisit, reflect, retell: Strategies for improving reading
comprehension. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Spelling
Gentry, R. J. & Gillet, J.W. (1993). Teaching kids to spell. Portsmouth,
NH: Heimann.
Hill, B.C., Ruptic, C. & Norwick, L. (1998). Classroom-based assessment.
Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon Publishers, Inc.
Pinnell, G.S. & Fountas, I.C. (1998). Word matters: Teaching phonics and
spelling in the reading/writing classroom. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Rosencrans, G. (1998). The spelling book: Teaching children how to spell, not
what to spell. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Writing
Hill, B.C., Ruptic, C. & Norwick, L. (1998). Classroom-based assessment.
Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon Publishers, Inc.
McCarrier, A., Pinnell, G.S., & Fountas, I.C. (2000). Interactive writing:
how language & literacy come together, K-2. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Student Self-Assessment
Hill, B.C., Ruptic, C. & Norwick, L. (1998). Classroom-based assessment.
Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon Publishers, Inc.
Servis, J. (2000). Celebrating the fourth: Ideas and inspiration for teachers
of grade four. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Assessing Reading for English Language Learners
Freeman, D.E. & Freeman, Y.S. (2000). Teaching reading in multilingual classrooms.
Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
| Name of Assignment: Special Needs Accommodation Paper |
| Faculty to be contacted for specific questions: Steve Curtis |
Objectives:
1. Applies understanding of the diverse learning needs of students and creates
instructional opportunities that are adapted to diverse learners.
2. Plan instruction based upon knowledge of subject matter (concepts, generalizations,
principles, and skills specific to the core subject areas), students, the community,
Essential Academic Learning Requirements, and curriculum goals.
3. To have the experience of modifying and individualizing one of your unit
plans for a particular child with special needs.
4. To learn more about a particular student’s disability by reading research
associated with that particular disability category.
Rationale for the Assignment:
Students with special needs (i.e., learning disabilities, attention problems,
physical impairments, etc.) are present in every classroom in the United States.
Instructional, curriculum, or environmental modifications/accommodations are
frequently required to meet the diverse learning needs of these students. Effective
teachers know when to make modifications/accommodations and base their interventions
upon current research.
Description of Assignment: You are to identify a student in
your teaching setting who has special instructional needs. It is best that the
student chosen be in special education. This indicates that the student has
a disability and is in-need of specialized instruction. If the student is on
an IEP, try and review this document before you finalize this assignment. Next,
you are to conduct a search locating articles or websites with information pertaining
to educational interventions for students with the same disability as your student.
Students must consult at-least 5 references. Appropriate resources include journals
(e.g., Exceptional Children, Teaching Exceptional Children, Journal of Special
Education, etc.), books, and/or web sites (e.g., advocacy organizations, university
sites, topical sites, etc.). You may also use information from Lewis and Doorlag
(2003). It is assumed that students will consult more than 2 web sites, but
only 2 of these can count towards the 5 references. Once this research is conducted,
you are to determine what modifications/accommodations are recommended/necessary
(i.e., classroom environment, the content of your planned unit, the instructional
style, etc.) for the student to be successful in your classroom. To complete
this project, you are to complete a 5-page paper with the following:
1. Description of the student (i.e., grade, gender, age, and type of disability);
2. Current levels of performance (i.e., abilities, strengths, weaknesses, etc.);
3. Brief summary of planned unit;
4. Type of disability and characteristics;
5. Research on the effective educational methods;
6. Planned modifications/accommodations.
7. Complete list of references (use APA style).
Criteria for Evaluation (equal weight):
Concise/informative description of student and levels of performance
Concise/information description of disability types/characteristics
Thorough synthesis of research on effective educational methods
Unit summary/appropriate modifications/accommodations
Complete list of references (at-least 5)
Due Date: Be prepared to present your information during last
special needs class.
| Name of Assignment: Instructional Technology Report |
| Faculty to be contacted for specific questions: Mark Roddy |
Objectives:
1. Creates and supports learning experiences that make subject matter meaningful
for students.
2. Applies understanding of how children learn and develop by providing learning
opportunities that support their intellectual, social, and personal growth.
3. Applies understanding of how students differ in their approaches to learning
and creates instructional opportunities that are adapted to diverse learners.
3. Understands and uses a variety of instructional strategies to encourage students'
development of conceptual understanding of various subject areas through critical
thinking, problem solving, and performance skills.
4. Makes fluent use of a wide range of technological tools to enhance the student
learning environment.
5. Considers ethical dimensions of teaching and applies those considerations
in choices of curriculum, instructional strategies, assessment, and strategies
to address individual differences.
Rationale for the assignment:
Educational technology has a wide range of potential applications in the K-8
curriculum. Teachers need to be aware of this potential in order to be able
to take advantage of these possibilities. They must also be able to critically
examine applications and evaluate the usefulness of particular aspects or examples
of software or hardware in their curriculum. This assignment is designed to
give you an opportunity to collaboratively investigate and explore in some depth
an application of educational technology that will be useful in your classroom.
Description of the assignment:
You will create a resource to support one of your units for this course, or
investigate a single application of educational technology and then summarize
what you discover in a presentation to your instructors and peers.
Find one or two partners (special clearance needed for solo efforts) and bond
with them in such a way that you become an invincible team dedicated to the
advancement of the appropriate use of instructional technology in the K-8 curriculum.
Look through the list of possibilities below. Select one (or let me know about
your alternative choice) and explore it thoroughly. Think about how this aspect
of educational technology could be used for the good of your putative students.
Concentrate on the relationship between good teaching and technology. In other
words, consider and be prepared to explain how you can use the technology you
selected to more effectively approach the valid educational objectives that
you hold for your students. Present the fruits of your labor to your colleagues
in a grand celebration of instructional technology to take place November 19th.
Think in terms of a 10 minute presentation. That should include a few minutes
for questions.
Possibilities for investigation:
• an Internet or World Wide Web site or project,
• a piece of educational software on disk or on CD-ROM
• a slide show (or DVD or CD-ROM photo disk show),
• a video tape series,
• scanners,
• camcorders,
• still video cameras,
• electronic books on CD-ROM,
Note 1: If you begin your investigation and find that the thing you are investigating
is not worthy of your investigatory efforts, please find something else. We
want to hear about the good stuff.
Note 2: If you investigated Web resources as an assignment in a 1-credit endorsement
course, you must find different resources for this assignment.
On November19th, you will have approximately 10 minutes to convey your findings
to your peers. Your primary goal will be to demonstrate the capabilities of
the application you have selected as it might apply in a classroom context.
Your presentation should allow your colleagues to understand the strengths of
the application, as well as its limitations. Be creative, not only as you envision
the use of technology in the classroom, but in the presentation of this information
to your colleagues. Be prepared to answer questions about the price and availability
of the application as well as its function.
Create a simple Web page or handout on paper summarizing the findings of your
investigation. Your summary should do the following:
• Give a brief general description of the application highlighting strengths
as well as weaknesses.
• Describe how you might use this application to benefit your students.
• In a list format, give, as applicable, the name of your application,
information about how to access it, how much it costs, etc., and an estimate
of the appropriate grade level(s) and subjects area(s). Make links as appropriate.
There are dozens of journals (and sites on the Internet, e.g., the California
Instructional Technology Clearing house at http://www.clearinghouse.k12.ca.us/
where software and hardware are discussed and reviewed. You might want to visit
a few of these and find out what you can about the application you have selected.
Here are a few of the possible journals where software is reviewed and matters
pertaining to instructional technology are discussed: MacWorld, T.H.E.
Journal, Instructor, Learning K-8 or any of the journals
from the professional organizations such as The International Society for Technology
in Education's Learning and Leading with Technology (http://www.iste.org/L&L/),
the International Reading Association's online journal, Reading Online
(http://www.readingonline.org) or
The Reading Teacher, the National Council of Teachers of English's Language
Arts, the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics
Teaching Children Mathematics and Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School,
National Science Teachers Association's Science
and Children, or Social Studies and the Young Learner produced by the National
Council for the Social Studies .
Criteria for evaluation:
1. The presentation addresses the objectives outlined.
2. The findings of the investigation were clearly presented and demonstrated
evidence of thoughtful preparation and commitment to professional growth.
| Name of Assignment: Environmental Education Lesson Plan |
| Faculty to be contacted for specific questions: Mark Roddy |
Objectives:
1. To synthesize your understanding of what it means to teach for conceptual
understanding in science by planning and teaching a lesson aimed at concept
development.
2. To work with peers and with a mentor teacher to develop, teach, and analyze
a lesson.
3. To apply the skills of peer coaching by providing feedback on a peer's teaching
performance.
Rationale for the assignment:
Science and mathematics are based primarily on the explanatory power of important
concepts. It is, therefore, important to teach these subjects in such a way
as to encourage the construction of conceptual understanding rather than memorization
of inert facts, formulae, and algorithms.
Thoughtful reflection on such a teaching experience and on the feedback provided
by peers can be an important aspect of the processes of review and revision
which are part of good teaching. Collaborative analysis of the teaching episode
can also help to facilitate the assimilation of important teaching and learning
principles.
Description of the assignment:
LESSON PLAN & MICROTEACHING: For this assignment you will develop the plan
for the lesson you will teach for the environmental education day at North City
Elementary (November 21). At least ten days before that day you should meet
with the teacher with whom you will work. Decide on a topic that will fit in
his or her curriculum and brainstorm ideas for teaching. Look through the Washington
State Commission on Student Learning Essential Academic Learning and select
the essential learning(s) that you plan to address with this lesson. Decide
which component(s) of the learning you will address. Make this clear in your
lesson plan. The lesson should involve the students in an active investigation
of the concept. (A more detailed description of the assignment is provided below.)
On the afternoon of November 14 you will have some time to practice and refine
what you will do your North City students.
Description of the Lesson Plan:
You will be working with a few others in a teaching team. The whole team will
turn in one document that will serve as a plan for the day’s teaching.
The document must have lesson plans for each segment/lesson that will be taught.
Here are the components I would like to see in each lesson plan. They may be
arranged the way they are presented below or you may have another format that
works for you and the classroom teacher. As long as I can tell that you have
addressed each of the components listed below, it's OK.
Introduction
1. Heading: (You don't need a cover page.)
Please include your name, the title of the lesson, and the intended grade level(s),
2. Rationale:
Tell me, in a paragraph or two, what concept(s) you are aiming at with this
lesson and why it is important for your students to work with this concept.
Lesson Plan
3. Invitation: (Anticipatory set)
This is the time to try to raise some questions in the minds of your students.
Get the students interested in the concept you are aiming at. This may take
the form of a demonstration, a discrepant event, a discussion of a current event,
etc.
4. Exploration:
Now that they have the question/concept in mind, how can they begin to construct
their understanding and address some of the questions raised in the "invitation"?
This might take the form of a directed activity, a lecture discussion, a library
research session, an Internet info-gathering excursion, etc. The point is that
they are assembling information relevant to the central question(s).
5. Explanation
Now they need to process the information they gathered in the "exploration"
phase and make sense of it. They can use their understanding to answer a new
but related question, to teach their peers about the concept, or some aspect
of it, to write a report, to answer a set of questions, to do some cross-age
tutoring, etc.
6. Assessment
How will you assess your students' understanding of the concepts they are working
with? (Please list and quote the benchmark(s) that are associated with the Essential
Learning(s) and component(s) you have selected.)
Special Needs:
Describe the factors in the lesson that make it effective for exceptional students
in your class (e.g., students with learning difficulties/disabilities, ESL students).
Technology:
Describe the ways in which you incorporate the use of educational technology
if it is appropriate.
Note that I do not require you to use the lesson plan format you were
given in TEED 512. If you are comfortable with that format and you can use it
to address the components I have described, feel free to use it. One of my most
important practical criteria for the evaluation of a lesson plan is simply this:
"Could a substitute teacher pick it up and use it effectively?" Even
more importantly, has your North City classroom teacher approved it and given
you feedback?
Criteria for evaluation:
Specifically, I will look for evidence that:
1. the lesson plan addresses issues inherent in teaching for conceptual understanding
in environmental education, mathematics and/or science.
2. you have considered the Washington State Essential Learnings in the selection
of an appropriate concept and the in the development of the lesson.
3. elements of lesson design are effectively used.
4. individual differences in ability, cultural background, and learning styles
have been considered and addressed.
5. an effective plan for assessing and evaluating how well students met lesson
objectives is clearly described and that the appropriate benchmarks have been
considered.
6. you have considered opportunities for the use of appropriate technology in
the lesson plans.
| Name of Assignment: Guided Literacy Focus Lesson |
| Faculty to be contacted for specific questions: Rosemarie Engman |
Complete example lesson plan:
"Using Context Clues to Identify the Meaning of Unknown Words", 2nd grade
Objectives:
1. Creates learning experiences that make subject matter meaningful for students.
2. Applies understanding of how children learn and develop by providing learning
opportunities that support their intellectual, social and personal development.
3. Applies understanding of how students differ in their approaches to learning
and creates instructional opportunities that are adapted to diverse learners.
4. Designs lessons and units of study to create learning environments that encourage
positive social interaction, active engagement of learning and self -motivation.
5. Plan instruction based upon knowledge of subject matter (concepts, generalizations,
principles, and skills specific to the core subject areas), students, the community,
Essential Academic Learning Requirements, and curriculum goals.
6. Understands and uses formal and informal assessment strategies to evaluate
and ensure the continuous intellectual, social and physical development of the
learner.
Rationale for the assignment:
Organizing reading and writing instruction into specific focus lessons helps
you synthesize what you know about literacy instruction, content, and lesson
design. A Guided Literacy Focus Lesson is the context in which you teach literacy
-- developing the skills and strategies that students need in order to read
and write independently. This lesson plan should fit the time frame of a focus
lesson (10 - 20 minutes). Focus lessons are relatively quick and direct and
relate to one concept or literacy strategy that students then apply through
their reading. Developing effective individual literacy lessons is critical
to assisting students' mastery of reading and writing processes.
This lesson plan meets the requirements of the Written Instructional Plan of
the Pedagogy Assessment Instrument. Although you may not end up teaching the
lesson that you plan for this assignment, it will help you prepare additional
lesson plans that align with the Pedagogy Assessment during student teaching.
Description of the assignment: Teach a reading strategy that
would fit into your Themed Literature Unit. For example, if your TLU is about
Finding the Courage to Help Others, identify a reading strategy that you would
teach so that your students could understand how characters found courage.
1. Learning Targets: What will you expect students to know
and be able to do as a result of the lesson?
• Identify one or more appropriate Essential Learnings for Reading that
fits a Continuum stage for learners in your student teaching classroom.
• Decide what strategies (or combination of strategies) for reading you
will teach to meet the selected EALR(s): e.g., identifying unknown words, predicting
and verifying; finding evidence in text to support a point; comparing and contrasting
characters or events; summarizing; using word identification strategies. For
more on selecting an appropriate reading strategy, refer to "Linking to
the Washington EALRs": http://fac-staff.seattleu.edu/kschlnoe/focuslesson.html#EALRs
2. Learning Experiences: Write a lesson plan to teach the instructional
strategy and content focus you have selected. Make sure that your lesson plan
clearly articulates the following elements:
• Accounts for students’ prior knowledge, skills, experiences, and
developmental levels;
• Engages low-status/historically marginalized students;
• Incorporates a multicultural perspective;
• Stimulates student problem-solving and critical thinking skills;
• Provides interdisciplinary connections across subject/content areas;
• Uses community resources and beyond as appropriate;
• Creates opportunities for students to work individually and in different
group arrangements that build academic competence for low-status/historically
marginalized students;
• Integrates technology to support and enhance instruction as appropriate;
and
• Includes strategies for creating an inclusive, supportive learning community;
managing tasks, and monitoring students.
• Follow the lesson plan format presented in TEED 512 (e.g., learning
target and evidence of learning, anticipatory set, input/modeling, guided and
independent practice, don’t you mean closure?). Organize your instruction
according to the Framework for Strategy Instruction presented in class. Use
the handout, “How to Teach a Reading Strategy” developed by Sue
Porter to guide you as you prepare the lesson. To help you select appropriate
reading skills to teach, refer to Tip #4: Explicitly Teaching Skills and Strategies
for Reading prepared by Sue Porter, Reading Specialist in the Shoreline School
District (http://www.shorelineschools.org/departments/instruction/curriculum/reading/pages/pdf/
tips4.pdf).
• Write a title for your focus lesson (e.g., "Using Context Clues
to Build Vocabulary Through Reading"). Identify the grade level for your
plan. Number the pages.
• Although most of your plan will be in outline form, write out what you
would say in the anticipatory set to introduce students to the literacy strategy
you will use. Make it clear to students what you expect them to learn (the strategy)
and why this strategy will help them learn it. This is the pre-reading portion
of your lesson. The information you convey to me in your rationale for the lesson
should be similar to what you convey to students in this section.
• Include some form of writing (e.g., during pre-reading, as part of guided
practice, as a response activity at the end of the lesson).
• Create and include a handout for one part of the lesson (e.g., pre-reading,
guided practice, independent practice).
3. Rationale for Learning Experiences: Write a brief statement
of rationale (3-5 sentences usually does it) explaining how your learning experiences
address student needs and engage low-status/historically marginalized students.
In addition, explain how the strategy you are teaching will help your students
develop as effective readers. Note: The information you convey to students during
the anticipatory set/pre-reading section should be similar to the rationale
you tell me in this section.
4. Assessments: Describe how you will evaluate how well you
have positively affected student learning. Assessment ideas abound in Conversations
and in Classroom-Based Assessment, as well as in Guided Reading and Strategies
That Work.
• Create and include the pre- and post-assessment tools you will use to
evaluate how well students have met the learning target(s).
• Explain how your assessments are suited for the developmental levels
and cultural backgrounds of your students.
5. Family Interactions: Describe how you will use personal
contact (e.g., telephone, home visit, and/or written message) to communicate
with families about their child’s learning and well-being relative to
this lesson.
6. Planning for Special Needs: Describe the factors in the
lesson that make it effective for exceptional students in your class (e.g.,
students with learning challenges/disabilities, ESL students). I am interested
in what you have done to ensure that this lesson will be effective for all students,
not how you would modify it for students with special needs.
Example lesson plans: http://fac-staff.seattleu.edu/kschlnoe/examples.html
Please Note: The sample lesson plans on this web site were all developed
before the implementation of the pedagogy assessment instrument (that’s
not its official title so think we should use lower case). Therefore, while
they are exemplary as models of explicit and effective strategy instruction,
the sample lessons do not conform to all of the requirements of the current
lesson plan. Please use them only as models of #2, effective learning experiences.
Even then, the sample lessons do not include all of the elements of #2.
Criteria for evaluation:
Guided Literacy Focus Lesson Rubric
| (Not quite there) |
(Meets expectations) |
(Exceeds) |
|
| |
Contains misspellings, typographical or grammatical errors; does not describe what will happen in the lesson; grade level not identified or pages not numbered. | Plan contains no misspellings, typographical or grammatical errors; fluently and effectively written; clearly describes what would happen during the lesson; grade level is identified and pages are numbered. | |
| |
Learning target(s) inadequately or incorrectly related to EALR(s), content, and strategy | Clear learning target(s) that shows how the lesson ties together the EALRís, content, and strategy | |
| Learning Experiences | Lesson plan does not clearly or effectively address all elements required. | Lesson plan clearly addresses all elements required. | |
| |
Does not clearly or effectively describe what literacy strategy will be taught and why it is important. | Clearly and effectively describes for students what literacy strategy will be taught and why it is important. Reflects the rationale appropriately. | Extensive and detailed explanation for learners about the metacognitive aspects of the literacy strategy. |
| |
Plan does not present effective reading/writing instruction for EALRs, strategy, and/or content selected. Ineffective or no explicit instruction in strategy use; ineffective or no application and reflection on strategy use. | Plan presents effective reading/writing instruction for EALRs, strategy, and/or content selected. Includes explicit instruction in the reading strategy and guides students to apply the strategy and reflect on their use of the strategy. | Extensive and detailed, explicit instruction in the reading strategy, with a strong emphasis on the metacognitive aspects. Plan provides extensive (and appropriate) application and reflection. |
| |
Not sound or not clearly described or inadequately explains why the lesson will be effective. | Sound and clearly described. Explains why the lesson will be effective in teaching the strategy. | |
| |
No accompanying handout; or handout does not provide effective pre-reading stimulation or guided/independent practice. | Accompanying handout provides effective pre-reading stimulation or guided/independent practice. | Handout provides xtensive practice and reflection. |
| |
No process for assessment; or assessment process not effective to assess and evaluate how well students met objectives; or no assessment instrument included or instrument is inadequate. | Effective process for assessing and evaluating how well students met lesson objectives is clearly described; appropriate assessment instrument included. | Assessment instrument provides extensive information about students' use of strategy. |
| |
Explanation of lesson's appropriateness for diverse learners is missing or inadequate. | Explanation of lesson's appropriateness for diverse learners is sound and clearly described. |
| Name of Assignment: Art Lesson Plan, Sketch Homework, First Year Journal |
| Faculty to be contacted for specific questions: Jennifer Macleod |
Objectives:
1. Create learning experiences that make subject matter meaningful for students.
2. Apply understanding of how children learn and develop by providing learning
opportunities that support their intellectual, social and personal development.
3. Apply understanding of how students differ in their approaches to learning
and creates instructional opportunities that are adapted to diverse learners.
4. Design lessons and units of study to create learning environments that encourage
positive social interaction, active engagement of learning and self -motivation.
5. Plan instruction based upon knowledge of subject matter (concepts, generalizations,
principles, and skills specific to the core subject areas), students, the community,
Essential Academic Learning Requirements, and curriculum goals.
6. Understand and use formal and informal assessment strategies to evaluate
and ensure the continuous intellectual, social and physical development of the
learner.
Rationale for the assignment: Learning in the arts is an essential
part of students’ basic education and, as a core subject, art is included
in the mandated Washington State Learning Goals. Research confirms the importance
of learning in and through the arts and the positive benefits of integrating
the arts into the curriculum of other subject areas. In order to prepare you
to provide integrated art instruction and demonstrate your understanding of
the EALRs in the arts, you are asked to develop an art lesson plan.
Description of the assignment:
Develop an art lesson plan based on one of the three units you have prepared
for TEED 521. You can select a unit in which you have already identified an
art lesson OR integrate an art lesson as an extension of an existing lesson.
Your art lesson will be based on a thematic approach to teaching art and integrating
art with learning in other subject areas (language arts, social studies and/or
science).
First identify a theme or topic that you want to teach, then select an artwork/artist
that exemplifies that theme or topic. Next, develop strategies for students
to analyze and interpret the artwork and plan an artmaking activity related
to that theme or topic.
There will be two main parts to your art lesson. Part I: “Looking and
Talking About Art” and Part II: “Creating Art.” You need to
address learning targets, learning experiences and assessment for both parts.
“Looking and Talking About Art” should focus on an art print/poster,
an art image on a website, or a real work of art on display in a local museum
or another community setting. Students have different life experiences that
help to shape how they view and respond to art. Learning to look and talk about
art develops keener observation and thinking skills – from concrete to
abstract. Students become art literate as they use art terms and discover themes,
ideas and symbols that artists use.
“Creating Art” is a student art making activity.
For example, if you focus on the topic of “Where Do I Live?” (My
Community, Daily Life in My Neighborhood, etc.), you might select a painting
by Jacob Lawrence depicting the Harlem neighborhood of his childhood. Students
will look and talk about a reproduction of the painting (analyze and interpret).
Then, you will share information about the artist and next, students will create
a tempera painting depicting a scene of their neighborhood.
Please Note: When we meet December 1, you will receive a sample
art lesson plan which I will review and demonstrate with you as participants.
Also, training will be provided in the use of a “Looking and Talking About
Art” guidesheet. The guidesheet format follows the Discipline Based Art
Education (DBAE) framework for looking, analyzing and interpreting art. It begins
with a broad view, becomes more art specific and includes an emotional response
to the work. The guidesheet questions encourage students to observe and analyze
the literal, sensory, formal and expressive qualities of an artwork and interpret
its meaning.
Refer to the lesson plan format presented in TEED 512 as a guide. Make
sure you include the following:
Learning Targets:
• What will you expect students to know and be able to do as a result
of the lesson?
• Identify the appropriate Art EARLs you will address.
Learning Experiences:
• Identify the theme or topic you want to teach. What is the grade level?
How does the lesson integrate with the class curriculum?
• Title the lesson.
• How much time will both parts of the lesson require?
• Identify the artwork/artist you will present.
• Will you be focusing on an art poster, a website image or a real work
of art? Explain.
• Describe your strategy for Looking and Talking About Art. What is your
approach to using
the guidesheet?
• What information will you provide about the artist and the artwork?
How will you present
the information?
• “Creating Art”:
• Materials/Equipment for students and teachers
• Art vocabulary
• Procedures (Include steps to follow before, during and after the lesson
is taught. What are your plans for preparing materials and room set-up prior
to the lesson and clean-up following the lesson?)
• Assessment: How will you evaluate how well students have met the learning
targets for
both parts of the lesson? Explain your informal and formal assessment strategies
and plans for student self-assessment and reflection. Design a rubric evaluating
the art activity based on the categories of Design/Composition, Craftsmanship,
Creativity and Effort.
Criteria for evaluation:
Specifically, I will look for evidence that:
1. The lesson plan is based on a thematic approach to teaching art and integrates
art with
learning in one or more other subject areas.
2. The lesson plan addresses your selected Art EARLs and target learnings.
3. There is evidence of clear understanding of the two major components: “Looking
and Talking About Art” and “Creating Art.”
4. Elements of lesson design are effectively used.
5. The lesson plan is written clearly and comprehensively.
6. Individual differences in ability, cultural background and learning styles
have been considered and addressed.
7. An effective plan for assessing and evaluating how well students met target
learnings is clearly described.
| Name of Assignment: Social Studies Integrated Unit Plan (Adapting Curriculum) |
| Faculty to be contacted for specific questions: Margit McGuire |
Objectives:
1. Creates learning experiences that make subject matter meaningful for students.
2. Applies understanding of how children learn and develop by providing learning
opportunities that support their intellectual, social and personal development.
3. Applies understanding of how students differ in their approaches to learning
and creates instructional opportunities that are adapted to diverse learners.
4. Understands and uses a variety of instructional strategies to encourage students'
development of conceptual understanding of social studies and its relationship
to various subject areas through critical thinking, problem solving, and performance
skills.
5. Designs lessons and unit of study to create learning environments that encourage
positive social interaction, active engagement in learning and self -motivation.
6. Uses knowledge of effective verbal and nonverbal communication techniques
and makes appropriate use of educational technology to foster active inquiry,
collaboration, and supportive interaction in the classroom.
7. Plans instruction based upon knowledge of subject matter (essential learnings,
concepts, generalizations, principles, and skills specific to the core subject
areas), students, the community, and curriculum goals.
8. Understands and uses formal and informal assessment strategies to evaluate
and facilitate the learner’s construction of conceptual understanding.
9. Synthesizes components of effective instruction by adapting a unit that reflects
an integration of curriculum.
10. Considers ethical dimensions of teaching and applies those considerations
in choices of curriculum, instructional strategies, assessment and strategies
to address individual differences.
Rationale for assignment:
One of the requirements of your preparation program is to demonstrate “positive
impact on student learning.” In the MIT Program that competency is met
through one or more of the unit plans that you create/adapt, teach, and assess
(for more information on these expectations, please see "Teaching Your
Unit"). To meet that competency, one option is the Social Studies Integrated
Unit plan (other options include the Themed Literature Unit or the Problem Solving/Data
Gathering unit). Most often teachers adapt published curriculum materials to
meet the specific needs of their classroom rather than creating their own units;
therefore, this assignment asks you to locate a unit that you will teach during
student teaching, evaluate that unit and adapt the unit for the specific needs
of your particular classroom. Through this assignment, you will demonstrate
your synthesis of long range planning, understanding of learning theory and
human development, integration of curriculum, and assessment of learning.
Key questions for your consideration
1. What social studies topic will you teach? What curriculum
is available to use to teach that topic? Consider social studies textbooks,
published simulations (e.g., Interact), school district curriculum units, Storypath
units, or other published social studies programs. Discuss with your cooperating
teacher a unit topic and appropriate curriculum to teach that topic that would
be suitable to use during student teaching. Be sure to explain that you can
be flexible in selecting a topic so that the teacher is committed to your planning
and teaching this unit. You may do this assignment with a partner but remember,
you are to teach this unit during student teaching.
2. Who are your learners and what are their needs and abilities?
In order to create a learning environment that works for your students, you
must understand their intellectual emotional, and social needs and abilities.
Drawing on your “Description of the Learning-Teaching Context” assignment,
provide a brief description of the learners for whom this unit is intended.
Include prior learning experiences that would contribute to this unit, classroom
characteristics, student characteristics, and strategies for fostering a supportive
classroom for all students as relevant to this unit. (See # 2 c. and d.)
3. What are the key learning targets (concepts/generalizations, skills/processes,
dispositions) that will be addressed in this unit? Look at the state
standards (district or building level guidelines also if applicable) and decide
what it is that you are trying to accomplish with this unit. Select a limited
number of learning targets that you will address clearly and directly. (See
# 2 a, b, d, and 3 a.)
4. What evidence will you accept that students have met the learning
targets? Describe how will use formal and informal assessment processes
to facilitate teaching, learning, and evaluation in your unit. In addition,
explain how will you gather feedback that will allow you to make sound instructional
decisions. You must demonstrate your understanding of quality assessment through
the structure of the unit. Determine the evidence you will use to evaluate how
well students have achieved the learning targets. Be specific. (See # 3.)
5. How will you gather and record your assessment evidence?
Create or adapt the actual assessment instruments you will use to record the
evidence described above. Include the following four instruments: 1) One preassessment
instrument that records students’ individual understanding of the learning
targets before the unit begins; 2) One formative instrument to record students’
understanding of learning targets; and 3) One summative performance assessment
instrument (rubric) to evaluate students’ individual understanding of
the learning targets at the end of the unit; 4) One self-evaluation instruments
for student use (you may select the focus for this instrument). (See #3 c.)
Categorize each instrument by type.
Label each instrument as to the learning target it addresses and indicate if
the instrument is preassessment, formative, or summative.
NOTE: If you use an assessment instrument created by someone else,
you must adapt it so that it relates directly to your unit. In other words,
you cannot use a generic rubric because that rubric does not specifically identify
the learning targets for your unit. You would need to add a component that specifically
related to content focus. If you adapt someone else’s instrument,
please credit them at the bottom of your instrument: "Adapted from …."
6. How will the unit you choose assist you in meeting the learning targets
and the individual needs of your learners? What are the strengths and
weakness of the curriculum? What adaptations will you need to make? What benefits
does the curriculum offer for your particular classroom? What classroom management
systems need to be in place for this unit to be successful? (See # 7 and 9.)
7. What do you need to know in order to teach this unit well?
How will you address these needs? What are some resources that will be helpful
for you? Provide a brief annotated bibliography. (See #11.)
8. How will you organize the curriculum on a day-to-day basis?
What is the sequence of lessons? On a generic calendar plot out learning targets
and activities day-by-day--remember that most learning targets will be addressed
over a number of days. (See # 4.)
9. Will you work alone or in collaboration? You may complete
this assignment individually or with one classmate (See #10). There are numerous
advantages to developing units of study in collaboration with a colleague. However,
since one goal of the assignment is to develop a unit that you will use during
student teaching, you need to make sure that it will fit both classrooms. If
you opt to do the unit as a team, include a brief explanation at the end of
your unit of how you worked together to design the unit plan. Indicate each
team member's specific contributions.
10. Service Learning: For one of the three units you teach
during student teaching, you will also need to develop a service learning component
for this unit plan, as specified in material you received in TEED 520.
For assignment description, evaluation criteria and rubric, please refer to the hard copy of your TEED 521 syllabus.
| Name of Assignment: Themed Literature Unit |
| Faculty to be contacted for specific questions: Rosemarie Engman |
Objectives:
1. Creates learning experiences that make subject matter meaningful for students.
2. Applies understanding of how children learn and develop by providing learning
opportunities that support their intellectual, social and personal development.
3. Applies understanding of how students differ in their approaches to learning
and creates instructional opportunities that are adapted to diverse learners.
4. Understands and uses a variety of instructional strategies to encourage students'
development of conceptual understanding of various subject areas through critical
thinking, problem solving, and performance skills.
5. Designs lessons and units of study to create learning environments that encourage
positive social interaction, active engagement of learning and self -motivation.
6. Uses knowledge of effective verbal and nonverbal communication techniques
and makes appropriate use of educational technology to foster active inquiry,
collaboration, and supportive interaction in the classroom.
7. Plans instruction based upon knowledge of subject matter (concepts, generalizations,
principles, and skills specific to the core subject areas), students, the community,
Essential Academic Learning Requirements, and curriculum goals.
8. Understands and uses formal and informal assessment strategies to evaluate
and ensure the continuous intellectual, social and physical development of the
learner.
9. Synthesizes components of effective instruction by developing a unit that
reflects an integration of curriculum.
10. Considers ethical dimensions of teaching and applies those considerations
in choices of curriculum instructional strategies, assessment and strategies
to address individual differences.
Rationale for assignment:
One of the requirements of your preparation program is to demonstrate "positive
impact on student learning." In the MIT Program, that competency is met
through one or more of the unit plans that you create, teach, and assess (for
more information on these expectations, please see "Teaching Your Unit").
To meet that competency, one option is the Themed Literature Unit (TLU)
which should be related to your Social Studies Integrated Unit or Problem Solving/Data
Gathering Unit.
Literacy learning is most powerful when tied to specific content. Therefore,
placing reading and writing instruction within the context of social studies
or mathematics/science learning makes sense. One way to do this is to organize
literacy instruction around a central theme that comes out of a social studies
or science topic.
A TLU differs from an integrated content unit whose main focus is content knowledge,
conceptual understanding, and integration in science, math, or social studies.
An integrated content unit, such as the Social Studies Integrated Unit or Storypath,
uses a topic as the central focus (e.g., Communities, Ancient Civilizations,
the Civil War). A TLU explores the human themes that might relate to those topics.
For example, a TLU (Facing Hard Times with Courage) might accompany an integrated
unit on the Revolutionary War by exploring through literature the rich themes
that might come from that topic (e.g., survival, injustice, discovering the
horrors of war, overcoming loss, developing character through adversity). However,
the same TLU could also accompany a science unit on environmental disasters.
A TLU can be built around fiction (e.g., read novels about the Civil War in
which characters portray various forms of courage), nonfiction (e.g., read biographies
of famous scientists and learn about the risks they took), or both. You
can structure a TLU using literature circles or more traditional instruction
(e.g., read one main novel as a whole class).
Key Questions to guide the development of your unit
The following sections will give you directions as you prepare your unit. Be
sure to consult the TLU rubric that follows for specific descriptions of what
you need to include.
1. What theme and content will you teach? A Themed Literature Unit
teaches key reading, writing, and communications skills within the context of
understanding the meaningful lessons in literature. Therefore, deciding on a
theme is your first planning step. In consultation with your cooperating teacher,
identify a theme that is appropriate for your students' level and possible for
you to teach during student teaching. Link the theme for the TLU with the topic
you choose for the Social Studies Integrated Unit or the Data Gathering/Problem
Solving unit. If you cannot link your TLU to your Social Studies Integrated
Unit or to the Problem Solving/Data Gathering Unit, plan a TLU around a general
theme that will be of value to your students (e.g., Persevering Despite Obstacles
could be a strong theme that isn’t necessarily tied to social studies
or science content).
Select a theme that deals in some significant way with the concepts of problem
solving and diversity. For example, the theme of "Immigration: Coping with
Loss" would include books and instructional concepts that address diversity
within the context of immigrants' backgrounds, nationalities, reasons for coming
to America; and explore the multitude of problems faced and solved in the process.
The challenge may be in deciding what is a topic and what is a theme. If you
selected "Immigration", you would have chosen a social studies topic.
The theme is a specific aspect of that topic, "Coping with Loss".
A good theme can be applied to a wide range of topics; similarly, a topic can
spawn many meaningful themes. We will discuss the process of selecting an appropriate
theme in class.
| These are topics … | These are themes … |
| Civil War | Finding Courage to Help Others |
| Marine Life | Taking Action to Care for Others |
| Endangered Species | Working for Justice |
| Communities | Standing Up for Your Beliefs |
This topic
~ Civil War ~
could relate to these themes (and more!)
Finding the courage to help others, Working for justice, Persevering despite
obstacles
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This theme
~ Taking Action to Care for Others ~
could relate to these topics (and more!)
Endangered species, Communities, Revolutionary War, Rain forest
Choosing a worthwhile theme with depth and breadth will make the unit much
easier to develop.
The following resources will help you as you develop your theme:
• Review the Themed Literature Unit web site:
http://fac-staff.seattleu.edu/kschlnoe/TLU/TLU.html.
This web site fully explains Themed Literature Units, how to plan them, how
to align the unit with the EALR’s, and how to develop students’
conceptual understanding of the theme
• Review sample TLU's from past TEED 521 students:
http://fac-staff.seattleu.edu/kschlnoe/MITexample.html
Examine the examples of complete units, as well as various aspects of the planning
process. These are intended to help you visualize the various aspects of a TLU.
You may adapt components of these examples for your own TLU. If you do so, please
give the author credit in your references. Please note that specific requirements
of the TLU assignment change each quarter. The sample TLU’s may not conform
exactly to the requirements of your assignment. Please verify with the current
syllabus.
• Further information on literature circles is available in Chapter 5
of Conversations, in Getting Started with Literature Circles,
and on the Literature Circles Resource Center Web site: http://fac-staff.seattleu.edu/kschlnoe/LitCircles/
Develop a thematic framework structured around a central thematic question:
Your theme should guide students to think about a central thematic question
or questions: What does it mean to (work for justice, persevere despite obstacles,
or challenge yourself to reach for the stars)? What does it take for someone
to (find the courage to help others, overcome adversity, or reach out to others)?
Develop a thematic framework that provides a rationale for teaching this unit
in your classroom. Answer the following questions: Why is this unit important
for student learning? What are the moral and ethical considerations that are
important in this unit? (See #2 a. and b. in the TLU rubric below).
2. Who are your learners and what are their needs and abilities?
In order to create a learning environment that works for your students, you
must understand their intellectual, emotional, and social needs and abilities.
Drawing on your “Description of the Learning-Teaching Context” assignment,
provide a brief description of the learners for whom this unit is intended.
Include classroom characteristics, student characteristics, and strategies for
fostering a supportive classroom for all students as relevant to this unit.
(See #2 c.).
3. What are the key learning targets (concepts/generalizations,
skills/processes, dispositions) addressed in this unit? In
other words, what will students know and/or be able to do as a result of this
unit? Include an assessment plan that addresses the stated learning targets
and will document a positive impact on student learning. (See #3).
Learning Targets: In a Themed Literature Unit, you develop
students’ conceptual understanding of a meaningful theme as you also develop
key literacy and communications skills. Therefore, the learning targets will
include EALRs in Reading, Writing, and/or Communciations (skills/process), as
well as concept/generalizations and dispositions related to the theme. Limit
your learning targets to the most important skills EALRs that you can address
effectively in this unit (probably 2-3), as well as 3-5 content generalizations.
Generalizations: The generalizations (concept/generalization learning
targets) for a TLU may differ somewhat from those you developed for the Social
Studies Integrated Unit Plan. In a TLU, the generalizations provide a focus
for your theme by specifying what aspects of the theme are being studied. Themes
can be very broad and all-encompassing, and there may be numerous aspects that
would be possible to learn. Consider a theme of Working for Justice –
and think about everything you might want students to know about what it means
to work for justice. The purpose of developing generalizations is to provide
some focus for you. Ask yourself, “What are the most important things
I want my students to know about working for justice?” Select three
to five generalizations that you feel would suffice. That will give you
a focus for instruction, and give your students a focus for their learning.
Please review the TLU web site (http://fac-staff.seattleu.edu/kschlnoe/TLU/TLU.html)
for more information about generalizations before you begin to develop your
unit.
Study the TLU examples from former TEED 521 students to see how the skills/process
learning targets relate to the concept/generalization and disposition learning
targets.
Categorize every learning target as skill/process, concept/generalization, or
disposition and clearly show how they fit together. (See #3 a.).
4. What evidence will you accept that students have met the learning
targets? Describe how you will use formal and informal assessment processes
to facilitate teaching, learning, and evaluation in your unit. In addition,
explain how will you gather feedback that will allow you to make sound instructional
decisions. You must demonstrate your understanding of quality assessment through
the structure of the unit.
Evidence: Determine the evidence you will use to evaluate how well
students have achieved the learning targets. Be specific: Rather than saying
that students will write about courage in their journals, specify what you will
look for in those journal entries as evidence of students’ understanding
of courage (e.g., “Journal entries will include three examples of courageous
action from the chapter”). (See #3 b.).
5. How will you gather and record your assessment evidence?
Create or adapt the actual assessment instruments you will use to record the
evidence described above. Include the following four instruments: 1) One preassessment
instrument that records students’ individual understanding of the theme
generalizations before the unit begins; 2) One formative instrument to record
students’ understanding of skill/process learning targets; and 3) One
summative performance assessment instrument (rubric) to evaluate students’
individual understanding of the theme generalizations at the end of the unit;
4) One self-evaluation instruments for student use (you may select the focus
for this instrument). (See #3 c.).
Categorize each instrument by type: Performance assessment or personal communication.
These are the most relevant forms of assessments in a TLU.
Label each instrument as to the learning target it addresses and indicate if
the instrument is preassessment, formative, or summative.
NOTE: If you use an assessment instrument created by someone else (e.g., Classroom
Based Assessment), you must adapt it so that it relates directly to your
TLU (learning targets, theme and generalizations). In other words, you could
not simply put in the Discussion Rubric from Classroom Based Assessment because
that rubric does not specifically target the theme and the generalizations that
you would want to assess through students’ discussion. You would need
to add a component that specifically related to your theme. If you adapt
someone else’s instrument, please credit them at the bottom of your instrument:
Adapted from ….
6. How will you document that your unit has made a positive impact on
student learning? What characteristics of this unit do you believe
will help you show that you have positively affected students’ learning
about the theme and their command of the skill/process learning targets? Briefly
describe. (See #3 d.).
Include a letter to families and students that informs them of the learning
targets, activities, and assessment of the unit. Explain how you believe this
unit will positively impact students’ learning. Invite families to participate
in some way. Refer to Appendix A: Communicating with Parents in Conversations
(p. 133b-148b) or pgs. 83-93 in Literature Circles Resource Guide (available
for check-out) for some ideas to modify. (See #3 e.).
7. How will you organize your unit on a day-to-day basis? What
sequence of focus lessons will you use to effectively guide students as they
develop the skills/processes and understand the theme? Plot out the overall
timeline of the TLU, indicating he number of days or weeks the unit will take.
For a unit with primary grade students who are reading picture books, the entire
unit may be completed in one week. For older students reading chapter books,
the unit may take several weeks. Indicate the sequence of focus lessons and
unit activities. (See #4 a.).
Explain how each focus lesson or series of lessons addresses specific learning
targets and how they will be assessed.
Although most of this section will be in outline form, expand the following
lessons into more detailed descriptions:
• The first session in which you introduce the theme and prepare students
for reading. (See #4b.);
• The summary session in which you synthesize students’ understanding
of the theme. Fully describe the process you will use to synthesize the generalizations.
(See #4c.) The following web site will explains the concept
development processes you can use to guide students to understand the theme:
http://fac-staff.seattleu.edu/kschlnoe/TLU/conceptdevelex.html
Finally, describe how your lessons will address the diversity of learners in
your classroom to meet individual needs. (See #4d.)
8. In what ways will you incorporate artistic response? Extending
students’ understanding of and response to what they read through the
arts is an important way to support varied learning needs. Describe literature
extension projects that will enable students to demonstrate their understanding
of the theme and generalizations. (See #5)
9. What books will you use? Select 5-8 children's or young
adult books (exact number will depend on grade level and reading level of students
in your class) that illuminate, extend, or relate to your theme. This will be
a challenge and needs to be approached thoughtfully. These titles form the core
of books that you will use in your unit. Your goal is to identify 5-8 well-written,
engaging books that complement your theme. You need to select an array of books
at varying levels so that you can use them in the following possible ways: As
a whole-class read aloud, picture books for focus lessons, books for discussion
groups, selections for independent reading related to your theme. One of our
goals is to help you become familiar with great examples of children’s
and young adult literature. Therefore, you are expected to read the books that
you select for your unit. If you cannot read all of the books, it is your
responsibility to know enough about each one to understand how it fits your
theme and to determine its quality for the unit.
Where to look for good books:
• Annotated bibliography in the Blue Pages of Conversations (74b
- 132b).
• Sample book lists in Literature Circles Resource Guide and in the searchable
database on the CD-ROM (available for checkout from Rosemarie).
• Teaching with Children's Literature web site:
http://fac-staff.seattleu.edu/kschlnoe/childlitlinks_copy.html
• Literature Circles Resource Center Web site: http://fac-staff.seattleu.edu/kschlnoe/LitCircles/
• TLU examples: http://fac-staff.seattleu.edu/kschlnoe/tluexample.html
Include an annotated list of the books that relate to your theme (See
#6). Include picture books, chapter books at varying levels of difficulty/complexity,
and informational books as appropriate.
Indicate how each book will be used (e.g., picture books to introduce the theme
and to be used in focus lessons, chapter books for read aloud, book choices
for literature circles).
Provide a bibliography of references used to develop the unit (in appropriate
APA format). These should include both professional books and web sites. Clearly
indicate how each resource was used with appropriate citations in APA format.
10. Will you work alone or in collaboration? You may complete
this assignment individually or with one classmate (See #8).
There are numerous advantages to developing units of study in collaboration
with a colleague. However, since one goal of the assignment is to develop a
unit that you will use during student teaching, you need to make sure that it
will fit both classrooms.
Presenting Your TLU at the Resource Fair:
You will share your TLU as part of a Resource Fair with a display related to
your theme and a brief oral description of the unit. The format for the Resource
Fair is much like a science fair: Five or six of you will be assigned to each
10-minute "session" and will set up your TLU displays at the same
time. The rest of the class will mosey among your displays, pausing to talk
briefly with you about your TLU. When the session ends, another assigned group
will set up until everyone has shared.
• You do not need to prepare any formal presentation -- just be ready
to say a few words about your TLU, perhaps give miniscule book talks about your
books, and answer questions.
• The only requirement for the display: Provide something for us to look
at besides you (e.g., samples of books, poster with generalizations, example
response projects).
• Prepare a one-page (back-to-front) handout for participants including
the annotated book list, learning targets and content generalizations, and any
other pertinent information you can fit on one page. Please put your name(s)
on your handout. Bring copies for each of your classmates and Rosemarie.
In addition, email as an attachment one copy of the handout formatted as a web
page to Mark Roddy.
Description of assignment: For assignment description, evaluation criteria and the rubric, please refer to the hard copy of your TEED 521 syllabus.
| Name of Assignment: Problem Solving/Data Gathering Unit |
| Faculty to be contacted for specific questions: Mark Roddy |
Click below for a model PSDG unit (pdf file) by Erin Maholitz (Winter, 2008)
Recycling Statistics: 6th Grade
Click below for a model PSDG unit (pdf file) by Audrey Roach and Michael Gustafson (Winter, 2005)
Stock Market Mathematics : Grades 6-8
Click below for a model PSDG unit (pdf file) by Joanna Hsiao (Winter, 2004)
From Paces to Feet - a
measurement unit: 2nd grade
Click below for a model PSDG unit (pdf file) by Ami Pendley (Winter, 2004)
What Life is Like in
Our America: Statistical Investigations about Teens by Teens: 7th Grade
What Life is Like in
Our America: Assessment Materials
Click below for a model PSDG unit (pdf file) by Emily Winterlich (Winter, 2003)
Aimals and Habitats: 3rd grade
Click below for a model PSDG unit (pdf file) by Vicki Birchfield (Fall, 2003)
Time: 5th-6th highly capable
class
Objectives:
1. Creates an integrative problem solving unit employing concrete investigation,
data gathering, analysis, and synthesis that allows students to construct meaningful
understanding of important learning targets in mathematics, science and related
content areas.
2. Applies understanding of how children learn and develop by providing learning
opportunities that support their intellectual, social, and personal growth.
3. Applies understanding of how students differ in their approaches to learning
and creates instructional opportunities that are adapted to diverse learners.
4. Understands and uses a variety of instructional strategies to encourage students'
development of conceptual understanding in mathematics and science through critical
thinking, problem solving, and performance skills.
5. Designs lessons and units of study to create learning environments that encourage
positive social interaction, active engagement in learning, and self-motivation.
6. Makes fluent use of a wide range of technological tools to enhance the student
learning environment.
7. Plans instruction based upon knowledge of subject matter, students, the community,
and the state* and national** curriculum standards and objectives.
8. Understands and uses formal and informal assessment strategies to evaluate
and facilitate learners' construction of conceptual understanding.
9. Considers ethical dimensions of teaching and applies those considerations
in choices of curriculum, instructional strategies, assessment, and strategies
to address individual differences.
* Washington State Essential Learnings.
** National Council of Teachers of Mathematics "Principles and Standards
for School Mathematics" and the National Research Council's "National
Science Education Standards"
National Standards: Go to http://www.enc.org/
Look for Professional Development on the left and click on “Standards
and Frameworks.” There you will find links to the national standards for
mathematics (Principles and Standards for School Mathematics [Please read Chapter
1 and the “Introduction” portion of Ch 2.]) and science (National
Science Education Standards [Click on "Access Now" and read the Overview.])
Rationale for the assignment:
Research in mathematics and science education points out the importance of allowing
students to encounter substantial problems whose solutions encourage the natural
integration of several curricular fields. It is important that students experience
the processes of problem formulation or clarification, data gathering, analysis,
synthesis and communication of results. Extended investigations such as this,
while they cannot be planned in complete detail, require the teacher to consider
students' conceptions of their subject matter as well as the learning goals
which might be appropriate for the investigation, and to prepare to facilitate
the students' learning. Classroom level assessment is an integral part of the
learning process informing teacher decision making and providing feedback to
students and parents as well as teachers. One of the requirements of your preparation
program is to demonstrate "positive impact on student learning." In
the MIT program that competency is met through one or more of the unit plans
that you create, teach, and assess (for more information on these expectations,
please see "Teaching Your Unit"). This competency can be met through
this and/or either of the other unit plans in this course (Themed Literature
unit or the Social Studies Integrated Unit Plan).
Key Questions to guide the development of your unit:
0. With whom will you work? How will it fit in your student teaching curriculum? If possible, you should do this assignment with one or two colleagues but remember, we hope that you are able to teach this unit during student teaching. Therefore, discuss with your cooperating teacher a unit topic in science and/or mathematics that will be acceptable during your student teaching. Be sure to explain that this is a state certification requirement so that the teacher is committed to your planning and teaching this unit. During class, we will make time for class members to find out what topics are to be addressed and to join forces as appropriate. If you work with colleagues, provide a brief explanation of how you worked together to design the unit plan. Indicate each team member's specific contributions. (see part 5a in the rubric)
1. Who are your learners and what are their needs and abilities? In order to create a learning environment that works for your students you must understand their intellectual, emotional, and social needs and abilities. Therefore, provide a brief description of the learners for whom this unit is intended. (see part 2c in the rubric) You may use the following questions to structure your response: What special needs and abilities do these students have? What prior experiences have they had that might be relevant? How will you account for diversity in your unit? (Consider such variables as culture, socio-economic status, special needs, ESL, learning styles, family circumstances, etc. )
2. What are your learning targets and how do they relate to the state and national standards? Start with the national, state or local (district) standards in math and/or science. Determine where your interests and commitments lie. Develop clear and concise statements of the learning targets that you will address in your unit. Depending on the unit, 3 - 6 learning targets will probably be sufficient. They do not need to be identical to the national, state, or local standards but where it is possible you should make connections between your learning targets and the standards. List these targets and explain briefly how they are addressed in the unit. (see part 3a in the rubric)
3. What are some of the key content and process knowledge needs that you, as a teacher, will encounter? What do you need to know in order to teach this unit well? How will you address these needs? What are some resources that will be helpful for you? Provide a briefly annotated bibliography. (see part 5b in the rubric)
4. What evidence will you accept that students are meeting your learning targets and how will you give students a chance to show you this evidence? What would it look like if students were meeting your learning targets? How will you use formal and informal assessment process to gather feedback and facilitate learning, teaching, and evaluation in your unit? You will demonstrate your understanding of the elements of quality assessment through the structure of the unit. (see part 3b in the rubric)
5. What learning experiences will you develop so that students can achieve your learning targets? Develop a brief ( approximately 5 - 10 lessons) unit which is centered on a relatively simple question, or set of related questions (see part 2a in the rubric) which you believe will captivate and motivate students and that will enable you to address your learning targets (e.g., for third graders: "When is it 'cold' outside? When is it 'hot'"? or "What do worms do?", or "How do airplanes fly?"). This question (or questions) is the basis for your unit (see part 2a in the rubric). Try to phrase the question in language that will motivate and appeal to your students. Describe your rationale for the question(s) you choose. (see part 2b in the rubric) Try to imagine the ways in which students might interpret and address this question, and the sorts of investigations they might need to undertake. These investigations should involve the collection and interpretation of data. This may involve the students in making measurements, surveying a population, gathering data from reference sources, etc. They should then learn and use appropriate mathematics and science concepts and procedures in order to analyze and interpret these data so that they can address the central question(s).
For example, if students are interested in the question "What do worms do?", one approach to the problem would be to send them to the library (or the Web, or both) to gather and synthesize as much information as they could about worms. This is a useful starting point. In the context of this unit, however, it would be appropriate to help the students set up a worm bin! (See, for example, http://whatcom.wsu.edu/ag/compost/Easywormbin.htm ) In this way they could, over the course of time, gather their own data about the way worms grow, eat, reproduce and generally live. They will probably also develop more questions and become involved in further investigations involving mathematical and scientific processes such as measurement, statistical sampling and inference techniques, suitable and unsuitable habitats, etc. The key is that they are gathering data and using them to solve problems (hence the name of the unit). In so doing they become actively involved in the construction of their understanding. The investigation provides a natural setting for the development of fluency in appropriately selected procedures.
The daily elements that make up the unit should be communicated through the outlines of lessons that will enable students to construct solid conceptual understanding of the relevant ideas and fluency with selected procedures. (see part 4b in the rubric) If there are 8 lessons in your outline, they need not be scheduled for sequential days nor all take the same amount of time. You might describe an investigation that takes place over the course of a week, a month, or the school year. An important aspect of the work you turn in will be a description of your assumptions regarding the possible reactions students might have to the problem as they proceed in the unit. How can you direct them to consider important aspects of the central question? What sorts of activities or investigations might you suggest? What sorts of learning goals might evolve in this setting? How might you involve family or community members (see part 3d and 4d in the rubric) in this investigation? Finally, how might you evaluate your students' progress toward these goals? (see parts 3b and 3c, in the rubric)
This is, of course, an opportunity for you to demonstrate your understanding of appropriate pedagogy. Review learning theory from Block I and Block II of the program. As you develop the lesson outlines be sure to demonstrate your understanding of these qualities of effective instruction:
(See part 4b in the rubric)
6. Service Learning : For one of the three units you choose to teach during student teaching, you will also need to develop a service learning component for this unit plan, as specified in material you received in TEED 520.
One of the requirements of the MIT program is for you to demonstrate “positive
impact on student learning.” During student teaching, you are expected
to teach at least one of the units you prepared in TEED 521 (Social Studies
Integrated Unit, Themed Literature Unit, and/or Problem Solving/Data Gathering
Unit). The data you gather as you teach your unit will be analyzed during TEED
540.
You are only required to gather data on one unit that will be analyzed during
TEED 540. If you have the opportunity to teach either or both of the other two
units, that will be excellent experience for you. But you only need to collect
data on one unit.
We present these guidelines in the TEED 521 syllabus to help you see the "big
picture" as you plan your units. The procedures described below will take
place during student teaching to prepare you for TEED 540.
Procedures (during student teaching):
1. Identify six students on whom you will focus the analysis of your teaching.
Choose students who represent a variety of experiences, background, interests,
and abilities. For example, you might select one or two students who are capable
learners, one or two who are more challenged, and perhaps one or two who are
English Language Learners or have special learning needs.
Although you will, of course, teach your unit to all students and assess everyone's
learning, you will only analyze the data from these six students in TEED 540.
2. Develop some sort of record keeping system to help you gather data on these
students' learning. You might keep a notebook with a section labeled for each
student.
3. Record student learning. As you teach, gather evidence of student work that
demonstrates your “positive impact on student learning." This evidence
should include the pre-assessments, formative assessments, and summative assessments
that you planned for your learning targets. Select examples of student work
that reflect a range of performance. Group work examples are acceptable provided
you have an accountability system for each learner contributing to the work.
4. Save all examples of student work, assignments/assessments, your unit plan,
and daily lesson plans for analysis during TEED 540.
5. When you analyze your teaching during TEED 540, you will be asked to respond
to the following questions:
• What did you do that positively contributed to student learning?
• What evidence supports that learning occurred?
• What would you do differently to improve student learning?
• What did you change in your plan and why?
Back to top