Grant Dermody
LITC 524
Professional Resource Review
5/11/03
The Case Against
Standardized Testing, by Alfie Kohn, Heinemann Publishing, 2000
Standardized Testing has
swelled and mutated, like a creature in one of those old horror movies, to the
point that it now threatens to swallow our schools whole. Of course on the
late, late show no one ever insists that the monster is really doing us a favor
by making its victims more accountable.
This is how Alfie Kohn opens his small,
but intense treatise against standardized testing.
Kohn starts the book by
exploring why standardized testing exists and why it has gained so much power.
He compares testing in the United States to testing in other countries (few
countries give formal tests to kids below the age of sixteen). He then explores
the different types of tests currently given, shows the varied roles of
teachers, administrators, and the press in testing, why poor kids and kids of
color do poorly on the tests, gives several alternatives to testing, and suggests
viable ways to fight the tests.
Kohn’s book is written in question
and answer format. He appears to be playing devils’ advocate with
himself. His writing is persuasive. He shows the arguments for testing, and refutes
them methodically, one by one.
This is an excellent book for any teacher. It
isn’t aimed at a particular grade level, Kohn feels that we all are
affected by testing, whether our kids take them or not. Testing is part of a
bigger picture; a more insidious infiltration into our classrooms and our
lives, and it won’t stop unless we act.
Essential beliefs:
Ø
It’s easier to
measure efficiency than effectiveness, easier to rate how well we we’re
doing something than to ask if what we’re doing makes sense.
Ø
Tests should never be
multiple choice, timed, given frequently or to young kids, or norm referenced.
Ø
There are much more
effective ways of assessing children.
Ø
Testing is a force of
politics and political decisions can be questioned, challenged, and ultimately
reversed.
Golden Lines:
Ø
“It’s not
just that the tests are often ridiculously hard; it’s that they’re
simply ridiculous. They don’t capture what most of us, upon reflection,
would say it means to be a well-educated person.”
Ø
“’I know
this sounds very bizarre, but you could put a number on these things without
actually reading the paper,’ said this scorer, who, like his coworkers
was offered a two hundred dollar bonus that kicked in after eight thousand
papers.”
Ø
“Because those who
are leaving, (teaching, because of testing) include some of the best….the
paradoxical result….is that the tougher standards movement has the effect
of lowering standards.
Ø
“The only thing at
which standardized tests are uniquely efficient is pitting one school, or
state, against another.”
For
more information see www.alfiekohn.org